|
Pendleton Bird Club Projects |
||
|
|
Albee-Ukiah Bluebird Trail
Many club members recall that the
Pendleton Bird Club
monitors two bluebird nesting box trails in Umatilla County — one is 20
minutes from downtown Pendleton at Poverty Flats, the other one is
approximately 40 to 50 miles south of Pendleton on the
Albee–Ukiah Road between Battle Mountain State Park and the town of Ukiah.
Annual monitoring of
the Albee – Ukiah Trail has occurred consistently over the past several
years by club members, including Jenny Barnett (and her young daughter) and
more recently by June and Duane Whitten. In 2009, Jack and Sharon Simons
volunteered to monitor the trail and asked Aaron for advise on how to
monitor nesting success to gather information that could be used to benefit
bluebirds using the site.
So far vandalism has
been minimal, possibly because local residents have come to appreciate the
large number of nesting bluebirds in their neighborhood. Weather and
wildlife do take their annual toll, however, requiring some boxes to be
replaced or restored. Duane has taken on the annual maintenance chores and
can take credit for the excellent condition of the boxes on the trail. History
The purpose of creating a bluebird
nesting box trail was 1) to increase secondary nesting sites for the local
bluebird population, 2) to stabilize or increase declining bluebird
populations in selected areas and 3) increase public awareness of the
importance of maintaining natural habitat for healthy bird populations.
Unlike woodpeckers, bluebirds cannot excavate a nesting hole; however, they
will readily nest in a woodpecker hole or nesting box. Up until Club members have
generously donated their time to make the trail a success. In addition,
Kelly Lumber Supply here in Pendleton has regularly supplied
price-discounted Tight Knot Grade Red Cedar needed for box construction.
Boxes are maintained annually as needed with weather and critters taking
their toll. Sometimes a new roof needs replacing or, more often, a
woodpecker has enlarged the original hole requiring a front panel be
installed with the original 1 9/16 inch diameter hole necessary for bluebird
nesting success. Bluebirds have to
out-compete more aggressive bird species such as starlings (or chipmunks)
when the entry hole is too large. Even when the boxes are in prime
condition, House Wrens and Tree Swallows compete for nesting box
accommodations. With competition so high, this may be why bluebirds start to
set up their nesting territories in early spring before other migrant
species arrive. This year 11 bluebird pairs were observed near nesting boxes
as early as March 21. And yes, it was snowing at the time. Nesting Conditions
2009 was an excellent year for
bluebird nesting conditions. There was a deep winter snow pack which melted
off slowly into the spring season. This allowed spring runoff to percolate
deep into the soil It should be noted that
2009 was a “La Nina” year which is generally characterized by high moisture
levels in winter and spring. In contrast, 2010 is forecast to be a “El Nino”
year which is generally drier with a reduced snow pack and spring rain. It
will be interesting to see how the weather plays a role in next season’s
effects on bluebird nesting. 2009
Observations
We tried to set an observation
schedule to visit the trail every two weeks; however, that was not always
possible. A more rigorous scientific schedule Observations were made
on the following dates: Mar 21; May 10 and 25; Jun 14; Jul 1 and19; and Aug
8 and 24. The raw data is contained in a Word file that is available for the
asking. Since it is 9 pages long it would not be practical to insert it into
the Newsletter. The file has a page that summarizes the totals for the 5
categories we recorded. Feel free to email me (styletoil@eoni.com)
if you would like to have a copy of the raw data. For the Newsletter I’ve
compiled numbers that compare the First Hatch to the Second Hatch, which
provides a good comparison between the two brood periods. There were two
bluebird species in the study area, Western Bluebird and Mountain Bluebird.
Here is a quick summary comparing results of the First Hatch to the Second
Hatch: Type of
Bluebird Species Nesting in a Box (out of 32 boxes) First Hatch
= 31 W. Bluebirds and 0 Mt. Bluebirds Nest
Building Success (out of 32 boxes) First Hatch
= 30 W. Bluebirds and 0 Mt. Bluebirds Eggs
Counted First Hatch
= 124 Chicks
Counted First Hatch
= 117 Chicks
Presumed Fledged First Hatch
= 110 Totals for the study
period included counting 192 eggs, 163 chicks and 154 chicks presumed
fledged. There were 3.7 fledglings per box from the First Hatch and 2.3
fledglings per box from the Second Hatch. I’ve never seen a flock of 154
bluebirds but that would be quite a sight, wouldn’t it?
Wooded Area Vs. Open Area
Over the course of the monitoring
period we noticed what we thought was a distinct difference in the number of
eggs laid, chicks hatched and chicks presumed fledged in two different
locations on the trail. After turning off Hwy 395, Albee Road runs roughly
east - west for approximately 4 miles before turning due south for about 5.5
miles. The east-west section
of the trail is bordered by coniferous forest on the north and a wide,
grassy meadow on the south. In contrast, the stretch of trail that runs
north-south is mainly bordered by open grassy stretches. When we compared
the first 9 boxes on the wooded section vs. the first 9 boxes on the open
section of the trail, there were some significant differences in the number
of eggs, chicks, and presumed chicks fledged, particularly for the second
hatch. Wooded
Area
Eggs Chicks
Fledged First Hatch
40
28
22 Open
Area
Eggs
Chicks
Fledged First Hatch
41
40
38 We aren’t certain why the second
hatch numbers were reduced in the wooded area but predation by birds or
animals may have been a factor. Food availability should have been the same
for both areas. If more boxes are added to the trail in the future, we may
want to consider adding boxes to the open area rather than the wooded area.
Another year of observations will be needed before any conclusions can be
drawn. Conclusions 2009 was an outstanding year for bluebird nesting on the Albee Bluebird Trail with 154 presumed chicks fledged over the summer nesting period. Nesting conditions were excellent and the number of boxes occupied by nesting bluebirds was very high. Since 2009 was a “La Nina” year (and 2010 is forecast to be a “El Nino” year), we might expect to see a drop in the number of birds that will fledge in 2010. This is strictly a guess but the fact that there may be two distinctly different weather patterns back-to-back will make an interesting comparison. We will continue to monitor differences in nesting success between the Open Area and the Wooded Area to better understand future box placement along the trail.
|
||
Project Photos...2009
|
The inside of a box after two hatches...eleven chicks fledged
|
These five Mountain Bluebird eggs died during the second hatch period.
|
|
|
Nest box inventory built by Duane Whitten and stored in his garage until needed. After the 2009 season, three boxes needed individual parts replaced; one box needed to be replaced entirely; and, 2 boxes needed to be moved to a new location. |
Occasionally a box is opened to reveal a dead chick. This chick died during the second hatch while three of its siblings survived to fledge from the same box. |
|
![]() Duane mounting a new box to a pine tree. Boxes are made from tight knot grade red cedar for durability. Long wood screws are used to mount the box to the trunk of the tree. Boxes are mounted on the tree so that the entry hole faces away from the prevailing wind. |
![]() A pair of Mountain Bluebirds checking out a nest box on the trail. Only one pair of Mountain Bluebirds nested on the trial in 2009 (this pair, in fact) but the 5 eggs laid did not hatch. Photo by Aaron Skirvin. |
|
|
This nest was removed from the box after two successful hatches to show the 8-inch height of the nesting material (dry grass, pine needles and the occasional miscellaneous feather ) Notice the kestrel tail feather, left. |
Female Western Bluebird taking refuge in a nearby Hawthorne tree after we opened the box to count her eggs. Some females absolutely refused to leave the nest box after we opened the box which showed a strong instinct to protect her eggs and chicks. |
|
|
This is NOT a bluebird nest. A rodent (likely a chipmunk) built this nest after enlarging the entry hole. We removed the nest (at the time there were no babies in the nest) and a Western Bluebird female built a nest during the second hatch period. |
Four Western Bluebird chicks ready to fledge. This is the moment you wait for, knowing you had a small part in giving them the opportunity to start a new generation the next year -- maybe in the same box? |